![]() Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Kelley DE, Leibel RL, Nonas C, Kahn R Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention NAASO Obesity Society American Society for Nutrition American Diabetes Association. International Chair on Cardiometabolic Health. Canadian guidelines for body weight classification in adults: application in clinical practice to screen for overweight and obesity and to assess disease risk. Self-reported and technician-measured waist circumferences differ in middle-aged men and women. 2009 17: 1056–61.īigaard J, Spanggaard I, Thomsen BL, Overvad K, Tjønneland A. Waist circumference measurement by site, posture, respiratory phase, and meal time: implications for methodology. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īgarwal SK, Misra A, Aggarwal P, Bardia A, Goel R, Vikram NK, Wasir JS, Hussain N, Ramachandran K, Pandey RM. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. We present a detailed outline that will help clinicians and researchers to efficiently and reliably obtain accurate measurements of waist circumference. We include information on tape measures, measurement sites, and measurement guidelines. In this chapter, we present a description of the measurement of waist circumference. The importance of developing a systematic approach for identifying and marking the measurement site, positioning the tape, and recording the measurement cannot be understated. Consensus on the most appropriate measurement location has yet to be reached and several different sites and measurement protocols have been proposed. Waist circumference measurement is non-invasive and is easily accomplished by trained observers in clinical and research settings. The range of error for this test is +/- 2.7 percent.Waist circumference measurement is recommended in the clinical assessment of obesity and is a useful marker of total and abdominal body fat in genetic and epidemiologic research. This system is as accurate as hydrostatic (underwater) weighing, but quicker and easier to perform. It is the only authorized ADP for use with the supplemental body fat assessment right now. ![]() ![]() The Bod Pod® Body Composition Tracking System uses air displacement plethysmography (ADP) to determine the body’s fatty mass to lean mass ratio. The Bod Pod® Body Composition Tracking System The InBody 770 sends multiple mild electrical currents through the body, resulting in up to six different impedance readings that calculate body fat, muscle and water. InBody 770 Body Composition and Body Water Analyzer During the test, patients lay on the flat DXA table, and a scanning arm extends over them to deliver the X-ray. The DXA uses dual low-power X-ray beams that can accurately differentiate between bone mineral, lean mass and fat mass. If a Soldier does not request a supplemental body fat assessment or fails the assessment, they will be referred to the Army Weight Control Program. Should a Soldier fail both versions of the tape test, they may request a supplemental body fat assessment via the DXA, InBody 770 or The Bod Pod®, if reasonably available. After 12 months, the one-site tape test is the only authorized circumference-based tape method. A Soldier who fails the first one-site tape test may use the previous multiple-site body fat tape test for their confirmation tape test for 12 months from the date of Army Directive 2023-11.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |